Skip to main content
Globalbit

AI Coding Agents for Secure Environments

Your developers want agentic AI coding. Your security team cannot approve tools that send code, prompts, logs, or execution outside the perimeter. Globalbit deploys a private coding-agent stack inside your air-gapped or private-cloud environment, so engineers move faster without breaking security policy.

Client 1
Client 2
Client 3
Client 4
Client 5
Client 6
Client 7
Client 8

Ship code 24× faster. Inside your network.

Agentic coding tools can read a codebase, plan an implementation, edit files, run tests, fix errors, and prepare work for review. They are quickly becoming part of modern engineering workflows. But for air-gapped networks, regulated private clouds, classified environments, and security-sensitive engineering teams, the tools developers want are often blocked. Source code cannot leave the perimeter. Prompts, logs, repository context, and execution cannot depend on vendor-controlled infrastructure.

Globalbit deploys the full agentic coding stack inside your environment. Your developers get AI-assisted implementation, testing, debugging, and pull-request preparation. Your security team keeps control of the code, the model, the logs, the execution path, and the deployment schedule.

[ SECURITY ]

Built for CISO review in defense, finance, and regulated environments.

The agent works autonomously only inside approved boundaries. It can read code, write changes, run tests, fix errors, and prepare pull requests inside the development sandbox. It cannot access the public internet, restricted repositories, production systems, or infrastructure controls unless your policy explicitly allows it.

Every sensitive action is contained, logged, and verifiable by your own security team before rollout.

Five guarantees, enforced by architecture.

[ 01 ]

No external routes

Default-deny egress, dedicated network segmentation, and firewall verification confirm that source code, prompts, logs, and execution stay inside your environment.

[ 02 ]

Least-privilege access

The agent inherits the developer's existing permissions from your identity provider. It cannot read repositories or files the developer cannot access.

[ 03 ]

Sandboxed execution

Tests, builds, shell commands, and tool calls run inside a restricted execution environment with filesystem, network, and privilege boundaries.

[ 04 ]

Human-controlled merge path

The agent can prepare changes, but CI, code review, static analysis, and approval gates remain under your control.

[ 05 ]

Auditable AI activity

Inference logs, tool calls, file changes, test output, and PR summaries can be streamed into your existing security and audit systems.

Threat model your security team can verify

Source code leaves the network
Mitigation:Dedicated network segment, default-deny egress, and firewall allowlists at the boundary.
Verify:Review firewall logs and packet inspection results during full agent operation. Confirm zero external connections.
Agent accesses files outside scope
Mitigation:RBAC is inherited from your identity provider. The agent operates with the developer's existing permissions and cannot exceed them.
Verify:Point the agent at a restricted repository or file path. Confirm access is denied before indexing or execution.
Agent introduces unsafe code
Mitigation:AI-assisted changes remain subject to CI, code review, static analysis, dependency scanning, and human approval gates.
Verify:Inspect the CI pipeline, review AI-assisted commit flags, and run a controlled red-team commit through the workflow.
Agent executes destructive commands
Mitigation:Commands run inside a restricted sandbox with default-deny filesystem and network policies. Elevated Linux capabilities are removed.
Verify:Inspect sandbox policy, seccomp profile, mounted paths, network rules, and available Linux capabilities.
Model weights are compromised
Mitigation:Approved open-weight models are transferred through your controlled process, verified by SHA-256, and mounted read-only.
Verify:Recompute model hashes, compare against the approved release, and confirm read-only mounting at the OS level.
Prompt injection changes agent behavior
Mitigation:Tool calls run inside policy-controlled boundaries. Inference, tool use, file access, and execution events are logged for review.
Verify:Run adversarial prompt tests and confirm unsafe tool calls hit the sandbox, permission, or approval boundary.
Supply-chain compromise
Mitigation:Core components are built from approved source packages with pinned versions and verified hashes. Closed binaries can be excluded from sensitive deployments.
Verify:Rebuild from source, compare hashes, review dependency manifests, and validate the signed deployment bundle.

Autonomy where policy allows it. Enforcement where risk begins.

The agent runs inside a restricted execution environment with default-deny network and filesystem policies. Within the approved scope, it can read code, make changes, run tests, fix build errors, and prepare a pull request. Everything outside that scope is denied by design. Internet access, restricted repositories, production systems, infrastructure changes, and merge decisions stay behind explicit controls. The architecture gives developers speed without asking security teams to rely on trust.

Read files in scope (RBAC)
Containment:Inherited from developer's permissions.
AUTONOMOUS
Write and modify files in scope
Containment:Sandboxed filesystem. Diff visible in IDE in real time.
AUTONOMOUS
Run tests, compile, lint
Containment:Sandboxed execution. No host access.
AUTONOMOUS
Run shell commands in sandbox
Containment:seccomp-restricted. Linux capabilities dropped.
AUTONOMOUS
Open a pull request
Containment:Final human review at PR stage. Always.
PLAN APPROVAL
Access the public internet
Containment:No route exists. Physically impossible.
BLOCKED
Access restricted repositories
Containment:RBAC denies before request reaches index.
BLOCKED
Modify own weights or infrastructure
Containment:Mounted read-only at OS level.
BLOCKED
Touch production systems
Containment:No path from sandbox to prod network.
BLOCKED

The agent moves at agentic speed inside its lane. Outside its lane, it doesn't move.

[ DEPLOYMENT OPTIONS ]

Deploy where your security policy allows

One agentic coding stack, adapted to your environment: fully disconnected networks, private or sovereign cloud, and restricted hybrid setups. Developers get AI coding workflows while source code, prompts, logs, and execution remain under your control.

[ 01 ]

Air-gapped

For classified or fully disconnected networks where cloud AI tools are blocked. The full coding-agent stack runs inside the isolated environment, with approved media transfer, verified model weights, and no external routes.
[ 02 ]

Private cloud

For regulated teams that need private AI coding without exposing source code to vendor-hosted platforms. Deploy in your VPC, sovereign cloud, government cloud, or on-prem environment with traffic kept under your control.
[ 03 ]

Restricted hybrid

For teams that allow controlled outbound access under policy. The agent works inside your perimeter, with optional proxy-approved access to package registries, documentation, or approved internal mirrors.
[ WHAT YOUR DEVELOPERS GET ]

A coding agent that does the work end-to-end

Not autocomplete. An agent that reads, plans, writes, tests, compiles, and opens a reviewed pull request — while you keep working on something else.

[ 01 ]

Reads your codebase

Indexes every repo by function, class, and module. Learns your internal APIs, naming conventions, and architecture patterns.
[ 02 ]

Plans the implementation

Breaks the task into steps across files. Surfaces the plan for review before execution.
[ 03 ]

Writes the code

Multi-file edits that follow your conventions. Uses your internal libraries because it already knows they exist in your repo.
[ 04 ]

Runs the tests

Executes your test suite. Reads failures. Adjusts the code. Re-runs until green.
[ 05 ]

Compiles and fixes

Runs the compiler, parses errors, fixes them, iterates. Works with C/C++, Rust, Java, Go, Python — whatever your codebase uses.
[ 06 ]

Opens a pull request

Hands you a reviewed PR with diffs, test results, and a written summary of what it changed. You review and merge.
Background

See the agent finish a full day's task in 20 minutes.

A live walkthrough on your terms. We deploy the stack on a test machine, give you a real engineering task, and let the agent work end-to-end. Inside a network with zero external connections.

[ ARCHITECTURE — BEST OF WHAT THE WORLD HAS TO OFFER ]

Three layers. All inside your perimeter.

We evaluated every serious AI coding tool on the planet — commercial, open source, and hybrid. These three components, together, are the best the global ecosystem offers for agentic coding inside a perimeter. Every layer is Apache 2.0 or MIT. Self-hosted on standard Linux. No telemetry. No phone-home. Nothing in the path you don't own.

[ 01 ]

Client — your IDE

VS Code, JetBrains, or Eclipse. Cline (Apache 2.0) drives the agent. TabbyML's plugin handles inline completions and repo context.
[ 02 ]

Platform — TabbyML Server

Repo indexing, RBAC, audit logging, SSO with your existing IdP (Active Directory, Okta, internal). Apache 2.0, self-hosted on standard Linux.
[ 03 ]

Inference — vLLM + open-weight model

vLLM serves the model on your local GPUs. Open-weight model of your choice — see the model selection below.
[ MODEL SELECTION ]

Your security policy picks the model.

The strongest open-weight coding models in 2026 are listed below — ranked by current benchmarks, not by what we sell. The stack is model-agnostic. Swap weights, the rest keeps running.

DeepSeek V4-Pro
Size:MoE · 1M ctx
Origin:DeepSeek · China
License:MIT
Best for:Frontier agentic. Top SWE-bench Verified in 2026
GLM-5.1
Size:MoE
Origin:Z.ai · China
License:Open license
Best for:Strongest all-around open model in 2026 leaderboards
Kimi K2.6
Size:1T MoE
Origin:Moonshot · China
License:Open license
Best for:Leads SWE-Bench Pro for agentic engineering
Qwen3-Coder
Size:MoE · 480B
Origin:Alibaba · China
License:Apache 2.0
Best for:Best efficiency per active parameter
Devstral 2
Size:24B / 123B
Origin:Mistral AI · France
License:Apache 2.0
Best for:Strongest Western-origin agent. Fits on a single A100
Codestral 2
Size:22B
Origin:Mistral AI · France
License:Mistral License
Best for:Top inline/FIM completion. #1 on LMSys Copilot Arena
Gemma 3 / CodeGemma
Size:12B / 27B
Origin:Google · USA
License:Gemma license
Best for:Strong reasoning, small GPU footprint
Llama 3.3 / Code Llama
Size:70B / 34B
Origin:Meta · USA
License:Llama license
Best for:Broad ecosystem, fine-tune friendly
A note on Chinese-origin models

The top four open-weight coding models in 2026 are Chinese. They benchmark hardest, and the data-leak concern that drives most enterprise restrictions doesn't apply here — nothing in our stack ever connects to vendor servers. What does apply: procurement restrictions in defense contracts, supply-chain audit requirements on model weights, and reputational considerations tied to Chinese National Intelligence Law obligations on the upstream developers. Some customers exclude these weights outright. Others accept them after independent weight audit and SHA-256 verification against the official release.

If Chinese weights are off the table, Devstral 2 (agentic) and Codestral 2 (inline / FIM) are the strongest Western-origin alternatives. Devstral 2 is the only Western-origin model that competes at the agentic tier on a single-GPU footprint.

[ TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP ]

Roughly one-third the five-year cost. No license. Yours forever.

We're agnostic on build-vs-buy. Some teams need a commercial vendor's support model. Most regulated environments are better served by the open-source path: lower cost, full audit, no license clock ticking. We deliver both.

Hardware (5-year)
Commercial vendor:Vendor-mandated GPU profiles. Roughly 4× more hardware than needed.
Open-source stack (Globalbit):Quantization and serving tuned for your workload and concurrency.
License fees
Commercial vendor:Per-seat, scales with headcount, indexed annually.
Open-source stack (Globalbit):None. Apache 2.0 / MIT across the stack.
Implementation
Commercial vendor:Bundled, opaque, vendor-controlled.
Open-source stack (Globalbit):Transparent. Knowledge transfer included so your team can run it without us.
Updates
Commercial vendor:On the vendor's schedule, at the vendor's price.
Open-source stack (Globalbit):Open-source release cadence. You decide what to deploy and when.
After year 5
Commercial vendor:Renewal, re-platforming, or shutdown.
Open-source stack (Globalbit):You own the stack. Run it as long as you want.
Source code access
Commercial vendor:Closed binary on your classified hardware.
Open-source stack (Globalbit):Every line readable by your security team.
5-year total
Commercial vendor:Baseline
Open-source stack (Globalbit):Roughly one-third of the commercial vendor.
[ THE PILOT ]

From first call to production in three weeks

[ 01 ]

Scope

Align on 5 developers, 2–3 repositories, and success metrics that matter to you. Your servers, your repos, your terms.

[ 02 ]

Deploy

Full production stack on your servers — vLLM, TabbyML, Cline. Real agentic from day one. No demo mode.

[ 03 ]

Measure

Agent completes multi-step engineering tasks end-to-end. Time saved on real features. Zero external traffic, confirmed on your firewall logs.

[ 04 ]

Decide

Developer feedback, performance benchmarks, architecture docs, and a rollout plan for 50+ developers. You decide on real data — not this page.

[ BUILT FOR ]

Industries where code doesn't leave the building

Regulated environments where security policy decides what tooling exists. We deploy where the perimeter is the product.

[ 01 ]

Defense & Aerospace

Flight-system C/C++ and embedded firmware. DO-178C compatibility preserved. AI-assisted commits flagged in the audit log. Certification stays human-authored.
[ 02 ]

Intelligence & National Security

Classified network deployment. Air-gapped by architecture, not by workaround. Every inference logged for review. Source-available threat model.
[ 03 ]

Regulated Finance

Sovereign-cloud mandates, GDPR and DORA constraints. Full audit trail per inference. RBAC mirroring existing developer access controls.
[ 04 ]

Critical Infrastructure

Energy grids, telecom cores, transport networks. SCADA and OT-adjacent codebases under strict change control. The agent works inside the same gates your engineers do.

Why Clients Choose and Stay with Globalbit

Company Logo

We hired Globalbit to support our development, and we made a long way since. They always provided us with the necessary assistance in a professional, reliable and thoughtful manner. Working with subcontractors requires a lot of trust and responsibility — with Globalbit we had a great experience of cooperation with highly professional and dedicated people.

Nir Erez
Nir Erez
CEO, Moovit
Company Logo

Working with Globalbit was exciting, satisfying and occasionally surprising. It was impressive to watch Globalbit's team connecting with our deepest marketing challenges and professionally translating them to the technological space in the web and mobile environments.

Oren Tal
Oren Tal
CEO, Espresso Club
Company Logo

With Globalbit, we discovered a thoughtful company that carries out its mission responsibly, dedicatedly and in the highest professional standards. Surely, Globalbit can contribute to the success of any business or venture.

Henry Richter
Henry Richter
Head of Marketing, Maariv
[ FAQ ]

Frequently Asked Questions

How is this different from GitHub Copilot, Cursor, or Claude Code?

Every cloud-based AI coding tool — Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code, Codex — sends source code over the public internet to vendor servers. In an air-gapped network or a regulated private cloud, that's not an option. Our stack runs entirely inside your perimeter. The inference engine, the model weights, the IDE agent, and the platform all live on your hardware. No external routes exist.

Is this an open-source alternative to Tabnine?

What models can run on-premise in an air-gapped network?

How do you update the model and software without internet access?

Can the agent really work autonomously in a regulated environment?

Does this work for C/C++ codebases in safety-critical or DO-178C environments?

What hardware do we need?

How does our security team verify the system is actually contained?

[ CONTACT US ]

Send us your constraints. We'll send you the architecture.

Trusted by 250+ organizations. We respond within one business day.

Discuss your Project →